Skip to content
aworldofart

Curatorial notes · 6 min read

Curatorial notes: Brutalist Florals.

Where the collection's thesis came from, which references shaped the palette, and which plates almost made the final twelve but did not.

·The studio

Brutalist Florals is the first aworldofart collection — twelve botanical specimens staged against board-formed concrete substrates under raked single-source light. The brief was a literal collision between Karl Blossfeldt's 1928 specimen photography and post-war British brutalist architecture. Palette: muted ochre, bone, soot, concrete grey, dried-blood red. Twelve plates survived from approximately 360 candidates.

Brutalist Florals is the studio's first published collection. These notes — written by the curator after the run was complete — exist to put the work in context that the wall card cannot.

The brief

The starting point was a sentence: "What happens if the most ephemeral subject in art history (a flower) is staged against the most permanent surface in architecture (concrete)?" The brief was written before any candidates were generated. It included the palette, the lighting setup, the composition rules, and the reference set. The brief was strict; deviations from it were rejected during selection.

References

Karl Blossfeldt's <em>Urformen der Kunst</em> (1928) — the typological, frontal, scientific approach to botanical subjects. Robert Mapplethorpe's late-period flowers — austerity and scale. Simon Phipps's photographs of brutalist Britain — the substrate references. Wabi-sabi and ikebana — the discipline of negative space. The brief explicitly forbade greenery in backgrounds, vases, and glass; these are the visual habits the model defaults to and that the collection fights against.

The palette

Five colors, no saturation above 60%. The dried-blood red — applied only where a poppy or rosehip demanded it — is the only chromatic accent in the collection. Every plate was color-checked against the palette before survival; out-of-palette plates were rejected even if compositionally strong.

Plates that almost made it

A few notes from the cutting room:

  • "Tulip, late" — a beautiful single tulip on shuttered concrete. Cut because the subject was visually too similar to Plate 10 (Rosehip, late).
  • "Sunflower, drooping" — rejected because the sunflower's saturation broke the palette ceiling no matter how the candidates were rendered.
  • "Twin orchids" — strong composition but felt too "design-forward" — too clean, too obvious. The collection rewards work that resists.
  • "Bouquet" — a multi-subject composition. The brief explicitly required single subjects; the bouquet broke the rule and was cut despite being one of the more visually striking candidates.

Selection statistics

For transparency:

  • Approximately 360 candidates generated across the twelve intended plates (≈30 per plate)
  • 120 candidates survived the first composition pass
  • 48 candidates survived the palette check
  • 24 candidates survived the light-source consistency check
  • 12 plates final

A note on edition

Brutalist Florals plates are available in all standard sizes. The 36×48 cotton-rag tier is a numbered edition of 50 per plate. The studio does not destroy plate files; open editions in the smaller sizes will continue indefinitely. Only the numbered edition is signed and counted.